Showing posts with label psychology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label psychology. Show all posts

Nov 1, 2007

A Case study on Daren - psychoanalytic theory

A Case study on Daren - psychoanalytic theory


In Darren’s case, the psychoanalytical theory is used. This is because Freud’s (1901) psychoanalytical theory seems to allow the explanation of usual behaviour of Darren’s criminal behaviour. This theory also allows the dealing with personality, developmental stages of Darren and his ego defence mechanism, which lead to his perception of his criminal activity as ‘not that bad of a crime’. In this report, we will look at a few theories explaining Darren’s behaviour and actions.

Freud's (1923) notion that the child's relationship to the parent is responsible for everything from psychiatric diseases to criminal behavior speaks right through Darren’s life. Darren, a child ignored and isolated by siblings, consistently neglected by his parents, ignoring his needs and concerns, lost trust in her maternal mother, received no appropriate levels of supervision nor discipline from a parent, found no figure to model his life. All these devastating effects on him resulting in injury emotionally and psychologically, permanently alter the psychological well-being of Daren and contribute to the nowadays rebellious, low self-esteem, problem youth.

In Freud’s (1923) theory, personal growth attributes many of our human problems, from depression to drug abuse, sexual disorders, eating disorders, to early childhood experience. Darren’s problems arise from dysfunctional parenting, a form of abuse leading to adult co-dependency, and an inability to lead a full and meaningful life. Added to that Darren is the youngest of the sibling but due to the large age gap he become the only child as in terms in Adler’s’ (1964) birth order: a spoilt child. The only child is more likely than others to be pampered; after all the parents have put all effort into the child so to speak. They are more likely to take special care of their pride and joy. However, if the parents were abusive the only child would have to put up with the abuse alone. The youngest child syndrome like Darren’s is almost like the only child and is more likely to be pampered by the parents and family members since they would never have to be dethrone from that position. Because of that, they are more prone to be the source of problem. They may also feel incredible inferiority with everyone older and more superior. In Darren’s case, it is not only the factor of birth order; his early childhood memory plays a very important part. He was also neglected by his parents who caused him to be emotionally unbalanced. He is only able to relate with materialism not emotional ability and physical abilities due to his parents traveling and constantly leaving him home alone and showering him with extravagant gifts to compensate for the time alone.

Freud (1915) believed that every child normally progressed from the oral to the anal and to the phallic phase, unless some negative influence interfered with this development. However, if the particular needs of any one of these phases were either unfulfilled or gratified to excess, the child could become "fixated" and thus hampered in its psychosexual growth. In Darren’s, case the resentment, the harsh rejection and the neglect from the parents, especially the extended overseas trips left young Darren in the care of a nanny. Darren suffered Oral fixation and phallic personality for lacking in sucking the mother’s breast and the needs of phallic phases were unfulfilled. This results in Darren to have multiple sex partners to satisfy his unconscious ID pleasure.

Darren has unresolved anal fixation at the age of five. He constantly looks for approval or attention from his family. Darren missed the important stage of building trust with his family as an accidental birth. This proceeded to self-doubting as he grew with a nanny at home alone and felt a sense of being disowned. He is forced to the locomotor stage where he becomes more forceful and assertive to achieve anything he desired. This is seen when Daren started showing signs of behavioural disorder where he threw tantrums, engaged in petty theft and lied effortlessly and persistently. His obsessiveness in turning to mischievous and criminal acts caused his relationship with his siblings to fall apart making him unable to gain approval and attention from those he looked up to as he grew up. Nobody actually helped him with his development at this stage which caused him to be stunted in this area.

In the phallic stage of his childhood, the Oedipus complex is clearly seen in Darren’s case. Darren at the third stage experiences when Freud (1915) term as phallic fixation which involves unconscious wishes to have sexual intercourse with one parent and replace the other parent. If this stage is not resolved, the child suffers Oedipus complex. This is caused by the absence of a father figure at home and the failures to gain closeness with his mother. According to Freud (1915), failure to pass through these earlier stages successfully leads to unresolved conflicts throughout adulthood. Thus, Darren looks to other females to satisfy his unconscious desire for pleasure. During his Genital, stage the onset of puberty where the main concentration of feeling is focus on the genital. Darren, a child without proper parental care and guidance, began exploring his primary school classmates by sexually touching girls in the class, which might mean nothing to him, if whatever he does was out of his unconscious mind.

Darren’s role confusion was demonstrated when he was in secondary school. He starts to connect to local gangsters and truanted frequently. Without parental love and support, Darren was confused over his status, role at home, and in society. In the eight stages of development of Erikson’s (1980) social theory, during the fifth psychosocial crisis 13 or 14 years old to about 20 years, the child, now an adolescent, learns to answer satisfactorily and happily the question of "Who am I?" Nevertheless, even the best - adjusted of adolescents experiences some role identity diffusion: most boys experiment with minor delinquency; rebellion flourishes; self-doubts flood the youngster, and so on. Darren with no exception connects himself with the local gangs, as there is no modeling figure for him at home. Erikson believes that during successful early adolescence, mature time perspective is developed; the young person acquires self-certainty as opposed to self-consciousness and self-doubt. However, Darren could not understand and doubted his own abilities. Truancy is the clear sign of him not being accepted and acknowledged in his school which leads to his thinking of why he is ostracized by his schoolmate and being constantly ridiculed by the teachers.

Erikson (1980) believed a psychologically healthy adolescence normally anticipates achievement, and achieves, rather than being "paralysed" by feelings of inferiority or by an inadequate time perspective. The adolescent seeks leadership (someone to inspire him), and gradually develops a set of ideals (socially congruent and desirable, in the case of the successful adolescent). Darren is no exception, he too want to be an achiever but rejected by parents and the academic world left him no choice but to turn to the local gang and to being identified with them. This proving Maslow’s (1998 Maslow & Lowery) Hierarchy of Needs where human beings must fulfill the more basic needs, such as physical, security, and belonging needs before being able to fulfill the higher need of self actualization. Subtlety, Darren has the desire to be like his father, to be successful, to be a Mr. Nice in everybody’s eye, but he needed to belong, needs to find security which his family and friends can not provide. Unfortunately, he ended up with the wrong company, wrong belonging, wrong security and wrong motivator.

Other complications resulting from these three stages also cause Darren to have difficulty in maintaining friendship due to his basic selfishness and dishonesty. With his rich family background and his intelligent mind, he seemed to be a self-sufficient child who did not seek or need close relationships but his inability to concentrate and lack of commitment resulting from the anal stage causes his academic performance to slip downhill.


According to Skinner’s (?) operant conditioning theory; a behavior no longer followed by the reinforcing stimulus results in a decreased probability of that behavior occurring in the future. However, a behavior followed by a reinforcing stimulus results in an increased probability of that behavior occurring in the future.

In Darren case, the first reconditioning comes along when he was in primary school. His parent knowing his naughty acts did not punish the boy but protected him by making a donation to the school. This recondition fits Skinner’s (?) operant conditioning a behavior (stealing) followed by a reinforcing stimulus (donation) results in an increased probability of that behavior (stealing) again occurring in the future. At the young age, Darren felt that stealing is right because there is no punishment and perhaps he believes this is the only way to catch his father’s attention and have more naughty acts for the father to attend to. In other words, he found pleasure (thanatos) in what he is doing.

According to Bandura (1965), one of the major sources of self efficacy is through mastery experiences. In Darren’s case, whenever he does something mischievous or bad, he gets away with it when his father donates a large sum to the school. The action of Darren’s father put a positive reinforcement to giving him the attention he desires thus he keeps repeating his mischief and bad behaviour at school. According to Bandura (1965), a person’s behaviour is affected by 3 factors. These 3 factors are cognitive learning, behavioural learning and environmental influences. Darren feels good for doing bad. This cognitive learning causes him to have the perception that he gets attention from playing truant, using drugs recreationally, underage drinking and shoplifting. This was reinforced since he was little as he finds that that is the only way to get his father’s attention.

Darren has a high intelligence and through the external influences from peer pressure and observational learning from other the prison inmates he mingled with, he figures out methods to make better plans such as fraud of a bigger scale. To Darren, he sees the plan as an opportunity for an improved way of living. Through Badura’s (1965) theory of self efficacy, Darren unconsciously always falls back to bad or criminal activities from enactive learning since childhood as he was rewarded by his parent’s attention when he was naughty at school.

In his teenage years, Darren wants same pleasures of richness but refuses to rely on his parent’s provision as he gets older. This is explained through Erikson’s (1980) theory of the adolescence stage where the conflict between identity versus role confusion where like every teenager and young adult, he is tempted by his ego to be independent. Through this, he finds ways and means for earning an income including impersonating a registered charity collector or stealing an expensive suit from an exclusive menswear shop; and because his enactive learning causes him to always fall back on criminal activities. He finds himself returning to his family home when he gets desperate but not staying for long as he still tries to establish his independent status in the society. Darren is searching for his identity but is confused between the right and the wrong. He turns to drugs and alcoholism for temporary relief as he finds it as a way to liberate him from decision making.

Through his adolescent stage, being ignored by his parents where he developed no bond with any family members in his upbringing forces him to grow strong in his ego where his self defence mechanism is developed to protect himself from being ignored.

The Freudian belief that we are governed in our actions by powerful unconscious forces has shifted modern perspectives away from personal responsibility. In Darren unconscious self-argued: I am who I am and I do what I do not because of me but because of early experiences over which I had no control. I am not responsible for my actions, my father or my mother is. This is a defence mechanism of ‘projection’ which Darren developed throughout his stages of development when neglected by his family. He unconsciously denied responsibility for his actions because he believes that he has to be the way he is to survive.This belief too has done damage in Darren’s attitude towards women. Women, his mothers and as the primary caregiver, have had enormous anger directed towards him as architects and perpetrators of misdirected early childhood experience. Darren’s relationships with other women seem to reflect his parent’s relationship with him. His inability to long term commitment and care for other people is lacking as his parents were not always there or caring about him constantly as other parents do for their child. Adding to that, his mother only showered him with gifts but never developed a close relationship with him. His abnormal childhood rendered him unable to sustain any long term relationship with the other sex.

For his current offence, Darren realised that he needed a status in society to be trusted and a solid plan to build a business. With that in mind he invested a substantial amount of time in planning and researches with shows his seriousness in attaining success. As he is intelligent, he manages to start up the whole scheme without much trouble and for status, he uses his family name for trading. He somehow believes that his parents would support his business activities by using the family name for his plans. This might be due to the fact that they were always there to assist him at all times even in criminal activities when caught. He seemed to be confident in success as he seemed to be at ease with his actions during the interview with the psychologist. Darren seems to have the idea in his head and thinks that his parents would have done the same thing to achieve the status and richness through fraudulent activities. Being brought up in a house where he couldn’t have seen how his parents achieved status in society developed his ego defence mechanism of rationalising. His father also reinforced this by ‘bribing’ the school with donations, so that they kept Darren in their education system and the police, even when he was involved in illegal activities. Through the action of his father, he rationalized that everybody who is in business or rich could have been involved in some illegal or fraudulent activities to achieve their accepted status in society. We can clearly see this in his seriousness in putting a lot of effort planning and organizing his fraudulent activity. He is doing it to gain acceptance to the society, fulfilling his ego needs.

In conclusion, according to Freud (1915), Darren has a personality complex, which causes him to fall back to his criminal activities. In the youngest child syndrome according to Adler’s (1954) theory, Darren is driven to exceed his siblings who are well established with families and society. To achieve that, he tries hard to gain wealth status and recognition from society. From another perspective, Erickson’s (1980) explanation on psychosocial theories explained Darren’s inability to communicate or establish his own identity, which causes him to feel isolated, and the need to prove he is able to survive in the society by clinging on to gangs. He is trying to survive the social and wealth status through criminal acts which he believes is not wrong according to his unconscious mind.


(require more percise intext references)


References
Adler, A (1954) Understanding Human Nature, New York; Greenburg Publisher
Adler, A (1964). The structure of neurosis. In H.L Ansbacher & R.R. Ansbacher (Eds), Superiority and social interest (pp. 83-95). New Yiork:Viking press. (Original work published 1932) (13)
Bandura, A (1965). Influence of the models' reinforcement contigencies on the acquisition of imitative responses. Jornal of Social Psychology. 1, 589-595
Role cofussion
Erikson, E. (1980). Elements of psychoanalytic theory of psychosocial development. In S. Greenspan, & G. Pollock, (Eds.), The Course of life, Vol 1 (pp. 11-61). Washington, DC: US Dept. of Health and Human Services.
Erikson, E.H (1950). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.
Erikson, E.H. (1959). Grow and Crisis of the healthy personality. Psychological Issues,1, 50-100
Freud, A. (1946). The ego and the mechanisms of defense. American Edition, New York, A: I.U.P.
Freud, S. (1901). The psychology of everyday life, S.E., 6, 1-290.
Freud, S. (1915). Repression, S.E., 14,146-158.
Freud, S. (1915). Repression, The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 14. Edited by James Strachey. Lodon: The Hogart Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis, 1974.
Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id, S.E. 19, 12-66Freud, S. (1940). Spliting of the ego in the process of defence. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 22, 65 (1938), S.E., 23:275-278
Maslow, A & Lowery, R. (ED). (1998). Toward a psychology of being, 3rd edition , New York: Wiley & Sons.


Are criminals born or made?

Nature vs Nurture

Does an “evil gene” exist, a hereditary disorder that causes crime? There are numerous debates about what causes crime. Some people assume that criminal behavior is due to a person’s upbringing and life experiences (“nurture”). Others suggest that criminal behavior is more complex and involves a person’s genetic makeup (“nature”). Are people just born that way? Is criminal behavior pre-determined at some point in people’s lives? This paper will present how crime behaviors can be hereditary but most criminals are shaped by their environment factors instead. As the theories of genetic influences in crimes are undeniable; it should only be seen as an inclination of crime rather then the cause of crime (Raine, A. 1993 pg50). Hence, a criminal can be born but shaped and influenced by the society to cultivate the criminal traits in them.

Social scientists have argued the nature-nurture debate for many years, both in the popular press and professional literature. Nature proponents argue that biological factors and genetic composition explain much of human behavior. Nurture proponents contend that environmental factors, such as family, school, church and community, are paramount in the development of behavior patterns. Besides, some traits, such as human intelligence, depend upon a complex combination of both hereditary and environmental influences. According to Pollak, that there is a new way of looking at these different experiences that turn different genes on or off (Pollak S. 2002). New research reveals that life experiences can alter the biochemistry of many genes- our moral development later in life changes our genes and is this could be hereditary.

Cesare Lombroso, a 19th century Italian physician, reminded students that nurture, not nature, is responsible for criminal behavior. In contrast, Freudian psychoanalysis and the depth psychologies of Alfred Adler, Erik Erikson, Erich Fromm, Karen Horney, Carl Jung, Melanie Klein, Otto Rank and Harry Stack Sullivan focused on the dynamic unconscious (the natural instinct of a human), theorizing that the depths of human psyche integrates with the conscious mind to produce a healthy human personality.

Nevertheless, many researchers show that criminal behaviors can be hereditary. Human genes carry many personality traits inherited from their ancestors and even from their parents. Lombroso, regarded by many as the father of criminology, is convinced that people are born criminals as it is in an individual’s nature to commit crime. Criminals have been found to carry a few certain features and personality traits. According to Darwin and him, we evolved from animals. In this theory, genes mutate and get passed on to each descendant, concluding that some people are predisposed to criminality and they are not the same species as humans (AllAboutScience.org, 2005).

According to Sigmund Freud, all humans have criminal tendencies. However, the process of socialization curbs these tendencies by the developing of inner controls that are learned through childhood experience. Freud hypothesized that the most common element that contributed to criminal behavior was faulty identification by children with their parents. Improperly socialized children may develop personality disturbances that causes them to direct antisocial impulses inward or outward. The child who directs them outward becomes a criminal, and the child that directs them inward becomes a neurotic.
In Freud’s theory of the Defense Mechanisms, he finds the cause of individual behavior in the unconscious mind (Freud, S. 1930). Sociobiology attributes “genetics as the only factor of behavior”. The mankind uses each one of them in everyday life. One clear example of man being biological is that at sometimes man can have animal drives and desires. This drive is driven by the idea and of free will that is taken for granted.

Another theory Freud developed included the Id, Ego, and Superego (Freud, S. 1923). Here, personality has a definable structure with three basic components. The most primitive part of the personality, present in the infant is the Id, meaning “it” in Latin. The Id is an unconscious, irrational and immoral part of the personality that exists at birth (by nature), containing all the basic biological drives: hunger, thirst, self-protection, and sex. A component of personality, the id seeks immediate satisfaction of natural urges through primary process, without concern for the morals and norms of society. Ego and Superego deals with how the mind works conscientiously and unconsciously. It describes the behavior of the human body and motives of our actions. Freud was a pessimist when it came to human nature. He identified man’s weaknesses in saying that man is a biological creature with biological drives. He reflected these ideas from Darwin’s original ideas.

In Freud’s views, the three parts of the psychic structure – id, ego, and superego are always in dynamic conflict. We are always unaware of the conflicts between the id, ego, and superego. According to psychodynamic theory, when a threat becomes especially serious, it may lead to intense inhibitions and defenses. These may be expressed as violence and aggression- inhibiting reaction. According to Freud, humans are defensive. This defensive mechanism is part of everyday speech and action. The lack of basic need stimulates the unconscious id and impels a person toward aggression which may later express itself in a tendency toward criminal behavior.

If moral and social values are instilled from day one, an individual is given ‘will power’ as a tool for survival as well as the ability to practise self control. For example, Socrates, a Greek philosopher was analysed as brutal, sensuous and inclined to being a drunkard by a physiognomist. By admitting that the examination revealed his inner self, and learning to control it, he managed to overcome the negative side (Vold, B., Bernard, J. & Snipes, B. 2002, pg32). The ability to control negative desires or mens rea is a natural thing.

If we said that criminals are made by their surroundings and their social factors, we could safely say that criminals are shaped by bad influences or social status. According to Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, when the basic need for an individual is not met or self esteem is threatened, the individual will turn on his or her defensive mechanism as reaction to this perceived threat (Maslow, H. 1943). Some resort to robbing and stealing food and necessities as a way of survival. Another basic need of humankind is the need for belonging and acceptance by others. Some might feel forced into criminal activities to enable them to live certain lifestyles that will achieve this aim.

Because defensive mechanisms are unconscious, they are difficult to control. However, the psychologists of the 1950s and 1960s rejected this theory. Nevertheless, in recent years, the cognitive revolution has again made defensive mechanisms the subject of scientific investigation, and cognitive, developmental, and personality psychologists have found some evidence for their existence (Cramer,P. 2000).

Carl Jung and Freud shared the same ideas and even theoretical concepts, including psyche, ego, consciousness, and unconsciousness (Somerfield, R. & McCrae, R. 2000). But Jung greatly expanded the concept of the unconscious. Jung argued that the mind of the newborn infant is not blank slate, but is imprinted with forms from the past experiences that are common to all humans in the universe.

One major challenge of our time is to discover the underlying causes of crime and to develop new techniques for preventing it. Although we should not ignore poverty, racism, joblessness, and other environmental factors which do influence criminals, biological and genetic factors may prove to be powerful predictors of criminal behavior. It is hoped that genetic tendencies toward crime, if they do prove to exist, can be modified by early intervention with such methods as psychotherapy, classes in effective parenting, and improved preschool education. Additional research on both genetic and environmental factors is necessary if we are to prevent the emergence of criminals like the serial killer Ivan Milat – “the backpacker murderer” in future generations.

According to Lombroso and Ferri, there are four basic types of criminals. The first type is those who are born criminals. According to Ferri, this group constitute a third of all criminals. They are morally underdeveloped and epileptic. The second type is the insane criminals. This insanity is caused by a defect in their brains which causes them to be incapable from differentiating right from wrong. Intoxicated people are included in this group, since over consumption of alcohol has a similar effect on the brain. The criminal by passion is the third type, where according to Lombroso, these criminals are more likely to be females then male. They are usually urged by emotions or the need for revenge because of something or someone. For example, a mother who murders her husband who was found out to be the serial rapist of daughter. The strong emotions of betrayal and revenge for the overwhelming hurt done to her daughter would have driven her to the murder of her spouse. The fourth type of criminal is the occasional criminal. They comprise of a few categories. Firstly, the pseudocriminal who kills in self defense. Secondly, the criminaloid who are influenced by situations and circumstances to commit crime. Thirdly, the habitual criminals who are normally offenders of the petty crimes such as white collar criminals and last but not the least harmless, the epileptoid criminal who suffers from epilepsy.

In conclusion, theories of genetic influences in crimes are reliable, but are only factors influencing crime, rather than its cause. Environment and parent care, peer pressure and human needs play a large part unearthing the underlying motives and causes of crime, because humans are intelligent creatures that learn from experience. Hence, crime is a human act that can develop as a reaction to one’s surroundings and nurture.




References

Maslow, H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review 50, 370-396

Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id, S.E., 19, 12-66

Freud, S. (1930). Civilization and its discontents. New York : Jonathon Cape and Co.

Erikson, E (1980) Element of a psychoanalytic theory of psychosocial development. Greespan, S. & Pollock, G. (Eds.), The course of life Vol 1

Erikson, H. (1959). Growth and crises of the healthy personality. Psychological Issues 1, 50-100

Cramer, P, (2000). Defense mechanisms in psychology today. American psychologist, 55(6), 637-646.

Somerfield, R., & McCrae, R. (2000). Stress and coping research: Methodological challenges, theoretical advances, and clinical applications. American Psychologist, 55(6), 620-625.

Vold, B., Bernard, J. & Snipes, B. (2002). Theoretical criminology. (5th ed). New York: Oxford University Press
Pollak S. (2002). Experience alters how we perceive emotion, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Viewed on 16th June 2007, 2007 by AAAS, the science society.
<
http://www.eurekalert.org/ >

Viewed on 16th June 2007, AllAboutScience.org <
http://www.darwins-theory-of-evolution.com/ >

Raine, A. (1993).  The psychopathology of crime: Criminal behavior as a clinical disorder